However, the defendant shall be sentenced to the above punishment for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

From June 2012, the defendant is a person who is in a de facto marital relationship with the victim's mother C from June 2012 to the present.

1. Around August 2013, the Defendant stated that he was “when he lives in D” of the victim E (Seoul Sea Center on April 2016), the Defendant specified the time of assault as “round August 2012,” based on the victim E’s statement (the Gwangju Sea Center).

However, since the victim appears to have resided in D in 2012 and August 2013, the said statement alone cannot be readily concluded as 2012. The victim stated the time of assault as “victim E, East F, Defendant, mother, and this mother H’s travel together in August 2013, where the Defendant, the victim E, the victim E, and the H (victim’s mother) coincide.”

Since there is no possibility that the defendant may be disadvantaged to exercise his right of defense, the time of crime is different from the facts charged.

The victim E was assaulted on one occasion on the ground that the victim E was not able to work on the house in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group D, and the victim E was able to work on the house.

2. Violation of the Child Reinstatement Act (child abuse);

A. On July 2013, the Defendant, on the ground that the victim F (at the time eight years of age) discussed the land inside the instant vehicle at the front of D Borrowing parking lot as set forth in paragraph (1) of the above paragraph, had the victim walk the body of the victim beyond the lower floor by walking the body of the victim.

B. In light of the fact that the victim F returned home at the location described in B/A in 2013, the Defendant: (a) tried to see the victim F’s growth floor at the beginning of the meeting; (b) was sprinking the floor of the victim F by hand in order for F/L to avoid any sprinking; and (c) was sprinking the victim F’s bucks into three to four occasions at the meeting.

(c)

In November 2013, the Defendant, on the ground that the result of the Chinese test was not good, at the Defendant’s residence located in Seosan-si apartment G around 102 Dong 1403, the Defendant said that “A victim F was a man’s seat-to-kicker, who was trying to attract the Victim F to get out of the Victim F’s hand.”