However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 26, 2014, around 03:20, the Defendant recommended D, a police officer of the Dongdaemun-gu Police Station C police station, who was dispatched after receiving a report on the calculation of the drinking value, to return home to the Defendant’s happiness. The Defendant, who was a police officer of the Dongdaemun-gu Police Station C police station, who was called for, and sent out after receiving a report on 112 pertaining to the calculation of the drinking value, suggested D to have the Defendant returned home to the Defendant’s happiness, and obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties against the crime, etc. of the police officer by

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (including the fact that the person is against the previous one, the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc.);