If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 100.

1. On March 5, 2014, at around 23:30, the Defendant heard that the victim B (the 19-year old-old-old-age-old-age-old-age-old-age-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-child-based-based-based-child-based-based-based-based-based-child-based-based-based-child-based-based-based-child-based-based-based-child-based-child-based-child-based-based-child-based-child-based-child-based-child-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based

2. Defendant B, on the date and time, at the place, as described in the above paragraph (1) above, took one time against the assault of the victim A (the age of 24), and took one-time face of the victim G (the age of 23) to drink once a week, and taken one time to walk at the victim G (the age of 23) once a week, and suffered injury to the victim A, such as the victim’s dysium and tension, and the victim’s dysium and tension requiring approximately 20-day medical treatment, and other injuries to the head of the other part requiring approximately 2- weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to G, E, and F;

1. The injury diagnosis certificate (G), the injury diagnosis certificate (E), the injury diagnosis certificate (F), the injury diagnosis certificate (B), and the injury diagnosis certificate (A);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (an investigation of a victim G's wife);

1. The Defendants: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Defendants who aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendants were injured by a number of victims because of their dispute over the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, but all the Defendants were in this Court.