However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant was working at the construction site of the Gyeong-gun, North Gun, and was working in the office of the site director of D.

1. On May 9, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would have the right to operate a restaurant at the C public construction site, and would have personnel personnel to the on-site supervision, and would have changed the amount equivalent to KRW 4 million with the Hashed's gift certificate,” in front of the Gra of the victim F management of the victim F, located in the Gyeong-gun, North Guns E, North Korea.”

However, in fact, the Defendant thought to use the gift certificates that he received from the victim, and the above construction site agreed to operate without a "brine restaurant" with the Maritime Affairs Office, and D, a corporation to which the Defendant belongs, is merely a subordinate business of the above construction site, and the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to grant the right to operate a restaurant in the above construction site.

The Defendant received from the victim a new global gift certificate with a total face value of KRW 4 million, in the name of personnel expenses on the same day.

2. On May 18, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, at the above G on May 18, 2017, would allow the victim to sell meals for 300 persons with a meal at the C construction site. At the same time, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that he/she would have the person related to the company and the supervision conduct personnel affairs, and that he/she would request 80 million won at the expense of the said person.”

However, in fact, the Defendant thought to use the money received from the victim as another real estate purchase fund, and the said construction site agreed to operate without a brine called 'brine restaurant' with the Maritime Affairs Office, and D Co., Ltd. to which the Defendant belongs merely was a subordinate enterprise of the said construction site, and the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to grant the Defendant the right to operate the restaurant at the construction site.

The defendant is a sum of KRW 40,000,000,000 in cash and KRW 40,000,000 in checks, in the name of personnel expenses for the same day from the victim.