In addition, the injury suffered by the victim is an extremely minor injury that can be naturally cured without any need for treatment, and it cannot be deemed that it constitutes the concept of injury as provided for in the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal principles that recognized all of the facts charged in the instant case as guilty.

2. First of all, we examine the argument that the defendant could not be deemed to have escaped since he did not know the fact of the accident. The following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the victim driver's vehicle, who was in a direct progress at the left turn in violation of the signal, was stopped with the wheels of the victim driver's vehicle due to the shock that the defendant was faced with the left turn, ② the degree of damage to the damaged vehicle due to the accident in this case is relatively large, and the repair cost is at least 2 million won. ③ The defendant driver's vehicle went far away from the shock of the accident in this case (Evidence No. 37 page of the evidence record). ④ The victim clearly stated that the defendant stopped immediately after the accident in this case, but proceeded without leaving the vehicle (the trial record No. 46 pages), and the victim did not take necessary measures, such as aiding the victim even though the defendant knew the fact at the time.

Next, as to the assertion that the victim cannot be deemed to have suffered injury, the victim is the victim according to the above evidence.