When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 14, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 by the Suwon District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On June 12, 2020, at around 00:05, the Defendant, at around 00:05, driven a balpian vehicle with a blood alcohol content of at least 0.209% from around 500 meters away from the 591-dong 500-dong 500-dong 591, Escopic, Escopic, Escopic, Escopic, Escopic, Escopic, Escopic, at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the situation of running a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol;

1. Report on the circumstantial statement, investigation report, and notification of the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Records of judgment: Application of one copy of criminal records, reply note, and summary order;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of the provisional payment order is that the defendant, who has a record of driving a drunk, drives a motor vehicle again, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the crime, but it is very high in the blood alcohol concentration due to the drinking of this case.

However, considering the fact that the defendant is recognized as committing the instant crime and there is no other criminal records other than the above one-time fine, and other various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of committing the instant crime, means and consequence, etc., the punishment as ordered, shall be determined by taking into account the following circumstances.