However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] On April 25, 201, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daejeon District Court’s support on April 25, 201, and issued a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 as a fine at the Gwangju District Court on July 24, 2012.

[Criminal facts] around 00:35 on July 10, 2017, the Defendant driven B rocketing car at approximately 100 meters away from the 100-meter section of blood alcohol level to the same 144-rorop road from the front of the Yongsan-dong, Yongsan-gu, Gwangju to the 144-roropian road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. The point of judgment: The application of a reply letter to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In full view of all the factors indicated in the arguments of this case, including the fact that there was a history of punishment twice due to driving of drinking alcohol for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, however, there is no record of crime exceeding fines, the fact that there is no record of crime, the degree of alcohol during blood transfusion, driving distance, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, circumstances of crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined as per Disposition.