However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the on-site illness, etc.

피고인은 2015. 12. 26. 11:56경 서울 용산구 C 앞 도로에서, 휴대전화로 서울지방경찰청 112 종합상황실에 전화하여 “D이라는 남자가 7시 전에 부천 오정구에서 아들 E를 데리고 가 손을 여기저기 칼로 끊어놔서 울고불고 하니까 마약을 4~5인분 먹여 잠을 재워 놨다.”고 허위로 신고하여 이를 진실로 믿은 F파출소 소속 경찰관 G 등 10명의 경찰관들로 하여금 위 장소로 출동하게 하였다.

From that time until February 7, 2016, the Defendant filed a false report at least six times in the same manner as the list of crimes in attached Form 2, and had 30 police officers send out the scene.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning crime prevention and investigation through fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the 112 reported history, mobile phone photographs, and detailed statement of handling 112 reported cases;

1. Relevant Article 137 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of mental disorders;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act in the suspension of execution (see, e.g. primary offenders and mental disorders);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 44-2 of the Medical Treatment and Custody Act;