beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.08.19 2015고단4331

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of 100,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 25.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below] On April 9, 2014, the defendant sentenced ten months to imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the Incheon District Court on February 16, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On June 27, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) (hereinafter “Road Traffic Act”) without obtaining a driver’s license, driving Crano-freight at a section of about 200 meters from the front of the forest convalescent hospital located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City to the front road of the said 2nd Tho-dong.

2. On July 11, 2015, around 17:42, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) at the middle-gu, Jung-gu, Incheon; (b) at the middle-gu, Jung-gu, Incheon; (c) at the time, a Saturday was a Saturday; and (d) at the same time, there were many people, including the merchants and tourists, who sell coffee; (c) at the same time, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, tightly tighted the shoulder of the name influor (70 years of age) so that he would be killed; (d) the Defendant took a bath to the surrounding merchants without good cause; and (e) the merchants took a bath by changing the goods sold into a public letter.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by speaking or doing an act at a place where many people gather, led to slickness in the surroundings, and forced it to others without any justifiable reason.

3. 공무집행방해 피고인은 같은 날 18:30경 위 장소에서 위와 같이 행패를 부리다가 112신고를 받고 출동한 인천중부경찰서 D지구대 소속 경찰관 E으로부터 신분증 제시를 요구받았음에도 이를 거부하며 제1항 기재와 같이 주정을 하다가, 위 E으로부터 현행범으로 체포될 수 있음을 고지받자, “짭새새끼들 돈 쳐먹는 거 모를줄 알았냐, F 정부 좆같은 정부 똘마니 새끼들”이라고 욕설하면서 위 E의 멱살을 잡아 흔들고 발로 정강이를 수회 차 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the above E criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;