상해
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) stated that the Defendant, upon receiving a claim from the victim to well set off the head of the water tank from the victim, stated that “the Defendant would have well known that he would use the water tank as a water tank, connect him again, or connect him again,” and returned to him to the effect that he would return to connect him, and that he was going toward the direction of the Defendant’s home, and that he was able to return back to the back, and the Defendant was guilty of the facts charged in this case, even though the Defendant did not spawn the victim, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the judgment.
2. The judgment of the court below and the court below acknowledged the following circumstances based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below. (1) The victim stated that the defendant was made to go beyond the floor of the water tank used by the victim by leaving the investigative agency to cut the ice of the water tank used by the victim from the defendant to the court of the court below, and the defendant was found to be "ma" due to the defect of the defendant's physical character, and the victim's continuous demand for connection with the ice, the defendant was "ma", and the victim committed an act that seems to be at the time of the victim's occurrence, and the victim "I am a large amount of bits," and that the defendant was made to go beyond the body of the victim's hand by getting on the bridge of the victim, and the victim's statement was consistent with the circumstances and process of the crime of this case, and the victim's statement was made in order to make the victim's oral statement beyond the victim's own motive to remove the victim's own opinion.