beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.14 2013가합519694

손해배상(기)

Text

1.(a)

Plaintiff

A, Defendant 1’s Gyeongbuk-do School Safety Mutual Aid Association shall be 261,247,546 won and for this, June 20, 2013.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1) Defendant School Foundation E (hereinafter “Defendant Foundation”)

(2) Defendant F is the principal of the J Elementary School who belongs to the Defendant Foundation, Defendant G is the principal of the K secondary school who belongs to the Defendant Foundation, and Defendant H is the teacher in charge of physical training at K secondary school.

3) Defendant Gyeong-do School Safety Mutual Aid Association (hereinafter “Defendant Gyeong-do Mutual Aid Association”)

The Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for School Safety Accidents (hereinafter “School Safety Act”)

(4) Plaintiff A, as a J elementary school student, was a machine-building player belonging to the Korea Physical Aid Association, established to conduct school safety mutual aid projects to prevent school accidents and increase funds pursuant to Article 15.

5) On January 26, 2012, Plaintiff B’s father, Plaintiff C’s mother, and Plaintiff D’s chaired Plaintiff A. (b) In the event of an accident, Plaintiff A, at the K Middle School Sports Center affiliated with the Defendant Foundation, was faced with the head on the floor due to the mistake of the attachment of the floor movement while undergoing ridge exercise training under the direction of teachers affiliated with Defendant G and H, including Defendant G and H, at the K Middle School Sports Center affiliated with the Defendant Foundation.

(hereinafter referred to as “the primary accident of this case”) Plaintiff A, as seen above, faced head from the floor and was seated at the edge of the floor during a locking, immediately facing two heads on the floor while repeating the same turning action (hereinafter referred to as “the second accident of this case”).

The "accident of this case" in total of the first and second accidents of this case is "the accident of this case".

3) The Plaintiff A does not have awareness as having difficulty in pulmonary treatment and stove symptoms immediately after the instant accident.

C. The Plaintiff A’s act of making the body at the time of the instant accident was carried out by the Plaintiff A at the time of the instant accident.