대여금
1. As to the Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s 122,478,688 won and 122,246,587 won among them, the Defendant shall start from August 23, 2014.
1. As the Plaintiff transferred his claim against the Defendant to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff during the proceeding of the instant lawsuit, the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.
(Plaintiffs filed an application for withdrawal from a lawsuit on August 26, 2015, but the withdrawal does not take effect without the Defendant’s consent). 2. Determination as to the Plaintiff’s successor’s claim
A. It is identical to the description of the grounds for the claim as indicated in the attached Form indicating the claim (However, “creditor” is deemed to be “Plaintiff”, “debtor” to be “Defendant”) and the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor acquired the claim against the Defendant under a claim acquisition agreement entered into between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on June 2, 2015.
B. Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act of the judgment by publication