2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

On April 28, 2014, at around 17:30, the Defendant opened a multi-household house against the victim’s will and intruded on the residence of the victim C (V), which is a residence of the victim C(V) in Seosan City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made by the police officer in relation to D and C;

1. Entry of the police statement of E;

1. The application of each description of suspect's photograph, victim's residence photograph, digital evidence analysis report, investigation report (including photographs of page 103, attached to investigation records), or video statute;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. [Incompetence] is the same type of fine and one time, and the motive for committing an offense is inferior, and the victim’s mother-child relationship desires to be severely punished. In addition to the victim of this case, the victim of this case is also driving away a female student from school on several occasions, and his body is partially damaged and his photograph is taken, which is contrary to the high risk of repeating an offense [patriarched circumstances], and there is no criminal record above the suspension of execution;