All convictions against Defendant B and C shall be reversed.

Defendant

B B Imprisonment for a period of four and a half years, Defendant .

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court against Defendant B (the sentence of imprisonment for a period of four years and eight years, and the order to complete a program to prevent sexual traffic) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court against the Defendant (the imprisonment of five years, and the order to complete a program to prevent sexual traffic with 80 hours) is too unreasonable.

(c)

(1) The Defendant, G, and E conspired with the Defendant’s misunderstanding of the facts (as to the acquittal portion against Defendant C), and the Defendant: (a) conspired to commit a joint crime with the content of taking money and valuables from the Defendant’s male purchaser, and then, (b) moved to the commission of the crime; (c) this part of the crime without prejudice is accompanied by the above joint crime; (d) there was an invitation in advance to be free from suspicion of indecent conduct against CE in preparation for a case where CE does not comply with the demand of money and valuables; (c) even if there was no contact between the Defendant, G, and E before the crime was committed, it does not interfere with the establishment of the crime, and even if there was no contact with the Defendant, G, and E, and the Defendant led to this part of the facts charged two times at the prosecution’s investigation stage; (c) the details of the confession’s statement are specific and clear; and (d) the Defendant led to the confession at the court of the lower court to make a false confession, as it was for any other purpose.

“The Defendant asserted to the effect that it would not be favorable for other accomplices because he/she led to the Defendant’s confession of a false crime, and would rather be more unfavorable for them. In full view of the following: (a) there is no reasonable ground and motive for the Defendant to make a false confession at the prosecutor’s office; (b) G was in a relationship with the Defendant with the Defendant, and (c) there is no credibility in the statement of accomplices who did not have any fact that the Defendant did not participate in this part of the crime and that he/she did not participate in it; and (d) the Defendant would jointly cooperate with G and E prior to the commission of the crime against CE.