However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, the Defendants are above two years from the date of the judgment.

Defendant

A and Defendant B are punished by Defendant A due to a death penalty, and Defendant B is a birth penalty.

1. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. On April 8, 2017, from around 12:00 to 12:30 of the same day, the Defendants committed the crime against the victim D, in the “F cafeteria” operated by the victim D in both cities, and in the “F cafeteria” operated by the victim D in both cities, on the ground that the Defendant A does not abide by the part of the time schedule, Defendant A brought a disturbance, such as taking a large amount of the disturbance, taking a bath, and taking a bath, and allowing customers, who have provided meals in the restaurant, to stop meal.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with and by force interfered with the victim's restaurant business.

2) On April 8, 2017, from around 13:40 to 14:00 of the same day, the Defendants were unable to enter the restaurant by having the victim Party G enter the restaurant, on the ground that Defendant B did not have his parents easily find out while drinking alcohol in the “I restaurant” operated by the victim G in Yangju-si, and Defendant B did not have his parents.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with and by force interfered with the victim's restaurant business.

2. Defendant A was investigated into another case on April 8, 2017, on the ground that, at the head of the Yangju Police Station’s consolidated criminal office of the Yangju Police Station, 1699, the said police station JK affiliated with the said police station, arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender, and was investigated into another case.

During L/M’s hearing, the victim openly insultingd the victim by openly referring to the victim as “a dog,” “a bitch,” “a bitch bitch,” “a bitch bitch,” and “a bitch bitch,” “a bitch.”

3. Defendant B, at around April 8, 2017, at the police box located in N at Yangju-si on April 14:30, 2017, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices to the extent of KRW 120,000, the repair cost of the vehicle by walking a book that was arrested as a flagrant offender several times due to the fact that he was arrested as a flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1..