except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 17, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 13:35, Jan. 17, 2018, 2018; (b) obtained an investigation from the Daegu Northernbuk-ro 130 Police Station B to the suspect in relation to the instant case suspected of having been accused of fraud from the Daegu Northern-ro 130 Police Station B; and (c) obtained an examination from the suspect as a suspect; (d) had concerns over the discovery of the facts being distributed in a separate case; and (e) had the awareness of the fact of being discovered in a separate case, had the ordinary friendly D’s resident registration number, etc. being sent to the outside

Therefore, the Defendant was examined as the suspect, signed the “D” in the column of the suspect interrogation protocol, and issued the above suspect interrogation protocol to E who is aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the signature of S(D) for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

2. On March 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 14:50 on March 7, 2018, 2018; (b) around 14:50, the Defendant was investigated as a suspect with respect to the instant case, which was accused of fraud, from the Daegu Northern Police Station B, Daegubuk-ro 130, which was accused by C; (c) and (d) at the time of being examined as a suspect; (d) there was fear that the facts on a separate basis are revealed; and (d) there was fear that the fact on a separate basis might be revealed, and (e) there was an appearance of a usual-friendly D

Therefore, the Defendant was examined as the suspect, signed the “D” in the column of the suspect interrogation protocol, and issued the above suspect interrogation protocol to E who is aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the signature of S(D) for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding D;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (in respect of disagreements with suspect fingerprints);

1. Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of private signature) and Article 239(2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.