beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.01.18 2016고단4776

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 4776"

1. On August 19, 2016, at around 11:00, the injured Defendant received a claim from the victim D (hereinafter referred to as “the risk of exceeding 75 years of age”) that “the Defendant spreads water to the corridor in front of the Defendant’s house of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 503 Dong-dong 1511, to raise a higher level of drinking water,” and the Defendant was under the victim D’s claim that “the risk of exceeding 75 years of age was high,” and the Defendant was under the victim’s careless order when the victim’s internal part of drinking water was taken once.

2. The special intimidation Defendant, at the same place as before September 1, 2016, at around 07:0, at the same time as the preceding paragraph, and after the case of paragraph 1, knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

'The knife knife knife knife knife, put the knife into the house, and threaten the victim.

On August 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 11:23, the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 503-dong 15-story, and (b) around August 21, 2016, in relation to the Defendant’s assaulting the mother of the injured Party E (the injured Party E (the injured Party 40-year ), the Defendant committed assault by asking the injured Party’s left arms one time by asking the injured Party’s right hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and D;

1. Investigation report (12 verification of a detailed statement of processing a report);

1. Each victim photograph (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not use violence or intimidation against the victim D, and that the victim's arms were used to defend against the victim E. However, according to the evidence of the judgment below, the above assertion is not accepted since the defendant can sufficiently recognize the facts of assault and intimidation as stated in the judgment of the court below.).