2. Although there is a significant risk that the transfer of the means of electronic financial transactions, such as the instant crime, is likely to cause secondary damage, such as fraud, and in fact, damage has occurred due to the use of the means of access transferred by the Defendant for the crime of fraud, considering the fact that the Defendant had been subject to criminal punishment prior to the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details and motive of the crime, means and consequence, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.