Examining the facts charged in this case in accordance with the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the establishment of the crime of interference with business and the hearsay rule, omitting judgment, or failing to

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.