However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant and the victim C(the age of 39) are pro-friendly relationships, and the victim is the victim of the intellectual disability of the third degree.

At around 02:40 on August 26, 2016, the Defendant issued a warning that the Defendant would use money for drinking alcohol to the victim as stated in D and 205 of Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, where the Defendant and the victim together live together, but the Defendant took knife the victim’s knife with his hand once, and brought the victim’s knife (19cm in length on the day), which is an object dangerous to the kitchen as the victim resisted against it, and brought the knife (32cm in total length, 19cm in length on the day) and knife knife (20cm in total, 8cm in length on the day), which is a dangerous object located on the floor of the room, and knife knife knife the right side part of the victim’s knife for three weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The prosecutor's interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements made by victims C);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of knives of the victim's injury, photographs of the scene of the crime, seized food knives and prote pictures;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of the relevant crime;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Concurrent Consideration for the following favorable circumstances):

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act (in accordance with the revision of the law, not applying the sentencing criteria) is that the victim's knife knife knife, a dangerous object, inflicted an injury on the victim, and the criminal liability is heavy in light of the risk, etc.

However, the defendant recognized his mistake and is in profoundly against himself.

The victim wishes to punish the defendant in consultation with the victim.