beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.01.12 2016고단1224

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The defendant pays 5,500,000 won to the applicant through fraud.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 25, 2012, the Defendant called the victim D on July 25, 2012 and called the victim D to the end of 2016.

Since there has been a good vehicle, there is a lack of the price, it will purchase a high-speed vehicle with which money is invested, and sell it and then offer 7-10% of the principal and investment amount as profit after one week.

“The purport was to the effect that “.....”

However, in fact, even if the Defendant received money from the injured party as investment money, it was thought that the Defendant would make the above money with entertainment expenses, such as gambling, etc., so there was no plan to sell and sell the above money, and there was no intention or ability to make a full payment.

On July 28, 2012, the Defendant received 8 million won around July 28, 2012 from the damaged party, and 6 million won around the 30th day of the same month from the Korea Cit Bank (E) account under the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired the property by deceiving the victim.

"2016 Highest 1547"

1. On October 17, 2012, the Defendant calls from the victim F to the victim F, and loans KRW 600,000,000,00,000 to the Defendant, as the funds are insufficient to purchase two used vehicles for export, then he/she will be repaid at least 15 days.

“The purport was to the effect that “.....”

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, it was thought that it would be used as personal debt and living expenses, etc., so there was no plan to purchase the above money, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money because there was no other property owned.

The Defendant received KRW 6 million from the damaged party on the same day from the Korean Cit Bank account under the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired the property of the victim.

2. On November 1, 2012, the Defendant provided a victim C with a counseling service on the purchase of a motor vehicle by telephone at around 10:00, and would inform the victim of the method by which he/she can live in a new vehicle.

First, if a small vehicle is purchased, the contract is terminated later.