불법행위에 의한 손해배상
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 7,070,344 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from May 1, 2016 to November 22, 2017.
[See the main claim and counterclaim together] The plaintiff is the deputy head of the first factory of C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”), and the defendant was prosecuted on April 30, 201, while living together in the company dormitory of the same company No. 1204, the second factory vice head of the same company, and the defendant was charged with both assaults (hereinafter referred to as “the assault of this case”).
On August 23, 2016, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million in the case No. 2016 high-level3573, which was sentenced to a fine of KRW 200,000. On January 13, 2017, the Plaintiff was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1 million in the case No. 2016 high-level305, which was sentenced to a fine of KRW 200,00. The above summary order and the judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
At around 22:00 on April 30, 2016, the Defendant, while under influence of alcohol in the above dormitory, was "welth ...." on the ground that the Plaintiff was "Ilst ......................................................., the Defendant committed several violences on the face and breast side of the left side of the vessel, thereby blicking two wlth thoth thoth of the Plaintiff, which requires six weeks of medical treatment.
In opposition to the defendant's assault, the plaintiff boomed the defendant's bridge, and boomed the whole part of the defendant's inside to drink, and boomed the defendant for two weeks of treatment, such as an open common room, such as an entrance, and around the snow.
[Ground of recognition] The defendant is obligated to compensate the plaintiff for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the assault of this case, according to the above acknowledged facts, Gap evidence Nos. 7, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 2, and the judgment on the claim for the purport of the entire pleadings.
In light of the above facts of recognition, it is one of the causes of the instant assault to the Defendant, and the Plaintiff also committed the assault in the process of setting up against the Defendant, and this is deemed to have caused the Plaintiff’s damage and the extension thereof.