소유권이전등기 등
1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;
2. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
(b) declare participation under guidance;
9. Voting method: The plaintiff withdraws from the religious order of this case with respect to the provision of "e.g.," and the provision of 10.1 to 4 of the vote for pros and cons as a whole, 1) the plaintiff declares that the plaintiff will proceed with the voting. 2) The plaintiff will leave the religious order of this case.
3) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for the return of the instant real estate against the instant religious order and the Defendant. 4) The church property to be returned shall be transferred to the Plaintiff corporation and managed by the Plaintiff Association.
11. As a result of the aggregate report on the number of persons for the ballot counting and the total voting number: 122 persons (at the time of 115 persons, however, 7 persons at the toilet temperature shall participate in 122): Two opposing votes: 115 persons (G official, H sexual chart): five persons: 110 persons, five persons, who shall be signed and sealed, and five persons, who shall be within the signature and seal or unmanned: 110 persons, shall be 115 persons, in total, and the 110 persons signed and signed, shall be later sign, and the remaining five persons, who shall be 110 persons, shall be later sign, and this agenda shall be resolved later; * General receipt of the agenda (AJ official) shall be proposed: 3 persons, who shall be deprived of their post and who shall vote to leave the religious order; 125 persons, who shall be deprived of their total number of voters and 110 persons, who shall be notified of the voting order of this case, and the Plaintiff shall be notified of the majority 13 persons, 47, 105 persons and 1 other persons.
On the other hand, U and 63 persons (15 of them were withdrawn and 49 of them were the final applicants; hereinafter referred to as “instant provisional disposition creditors”) asserted that they are the Plaintiff’s members, and on April 29, 2015, filed a provisional injunction against obstruction of access and obstruction of worship against E and 7 other than E on April 29, 2015, the Suwon District Court filed an application for provisional injunction against obstruction of access and obstruction of worship. On October 8, 2015, “E” and 7 other than E from the said court.