However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive against the Defendants.

1. Defendant A is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with D on July 10, 2009.

(1) At around 21:00 on January 11, 2014, the Defendant provided a single sexual intercourse with B at the studio in B located in the window E of Changwon-si.

(2) Around 21:00 on January 18, 2014, the Defendant sent sexual intercourse with the above B at the same place.

(3) Around 21:00 on January 25, 2014, the Defendant sent sexual intercourse with the above B at the same place.

Accordingly, the defendant was sent to the above B more than three times in total.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of the above A, and even at the same time, at the same place as that of the above 1. Paragraph, the Defendant had sexual intercourse with A three times, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes No. 1, 2, and 5 to the evidence list submitted by the prosecutor;

1. Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution (the first crime, confession, and reflector);