When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. The Defendant, who was introduced through the Victim C (M, 42 years of age), was dissatisfied with the victim by suffering from the damage of acquiring money in the name of the purchase price of used vehicles from the victim.

At around December 15:12, 2015, the Defendant demanded the victim to pay his amount of damage on behalf of the victim at the Defendant’s residence located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the Defendant sent a text message “I think well, because he did not want to pay his amount of damage, and may lose his amount because he did not want to do so, I would be able to do so any more.” Moreover, from around that time to February 25, 2016, the Defendant sent the victim with a text message stating that “I would be able to pay his amount of damage on behalf of the victim.” From that time to February 25, 2016, the Defendant threatened the victim by sending a text message stating that I would make the victim know that he would be in inhuman relationship with the Defendant.

2. On May 4, 2015, the Defendant of defamation: (a) around 16:00, at the G clothes shop located in Jindo-si, Jindo-si, Jindo-si, Jindo-si, and three customers; (b) the facts do not indicate that the victimized person has a financial obligation to pay to the Defendant, or that the injured person has not obtained money from the Defendant, or that the injured person does not have obtained money from the Defendant, and that is not a so-called “snick-snick” that approaches male and female, “Cwl and male slicks fraud” are

It is a full-scale fraud change in the 1970s when miscellaneous, and as a result, there is a few guards.

The head of the Sink-in, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, and the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu.

The victim had damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by stating that it is a daily allowance for the skin management room, the same day, and the same male, etc. is a change in the food fraud.

In addition, on October 2015, the Defendant, in the management room operated by the injured party in the old-gu, Gowon-si, who had a customer and his employee, is the victim’s “inducate tax base of, and taxing to, the amount of money, converted from fraud,” and the victim’s “induction”.