The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that all of the facts charged in the instant case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the concept of “work”, self-defense, legitimate act, and self-help in the crime of interference

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.