저작권법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor in the summary of the grounds for appeal, the defendant ordered the employees of the above company to acquire and use the reproduction of the program of this case as the representative director of the KCAC, or impliedly accepted and neglected the above acquisition and use of the program of this case as stated in the facts charged, and thereby, it can be acknowledged that the copyright holder of this case infringed the copyright of the program of this case as stated in the facts charged, but the court below acquitted the defendant of the facts charged.
2. Determination
A. The summary of the facts charged is C’s representative director who manufactures and sells telecommunications equipment and parts.
On December 2, 2014, the Defendant acquired a reproduction of the program equivalent to KRW 17,521,365,400 (hereinafter “instant program”) of the 29 program’s 29 program’s 29 program’s 17,521,365,40, as indicated in the attached list of crimes in the judgment of the court below, while being aware of the fact that the reproduction was used for the above company’s business.
Accordingly, the Defendant infringed on the copyright of the program copyright holder of the instant case.
나. 판단 ㈎ 저작권법 제136조 제2항 제4호, 제124조 제1항 제3호에 의하면, 프로그램의 저작권을 침해하여 만들어진 프로그램의 복제물을 그 사실을 알면서 취득한 자가 이를 업무상 이용하는 행위를 하는 경우 그 행위자를 처벌하도록 규정하고 있으므로, 법인의 직원이 프로그램의 저작권을 침해하여 만들어진 프로그램의 복제물을 그 사실을 알면서 이를 취득하여 업무상 이용하였을 뿐 법인의 대표자가 이를...