A. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of ten months.

(b).

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint crime committed by Defendant A and Defendant B were executed by Defendant A, and Defendant B was designed and supervised by using the name of the ArchitectJ, with respect to 102 multi-family housing of 102 households K-household, the Gyeonggi-si Association of Certified Architect in Gwangju-si, the design of which is 2,600 meters wide from 1,875 meters wide, but is actually 1,875 meters wide, and the underground floor is not recognized as an underground floor because the underground floor was protruding over more than 1/2, and the father of the underground floor was requested to supplement that is different from the design books, the design report was prepared through a certified architect who was not designated as a special inspection and received approval for the use of the building.

Defendant

A requested an architect M to prepare an inspection report on April 10, 2013, and Defendant B registered an architect M as an agent for confirmation at the O office located in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si, as if he was designated as an agent for confirmation, and the architect M had not been designated as an agent for special inspection as above but had not been designated as an agent for special inspection, after entering the false information into the current status column after the completion of the form of the approval for use and inspection report, and transmitting it to P around April 12, 2013, the owner was notified of the approval for the use of the above building.

As such, the Defendants conspired with the above M in writing the electronic records, exercised the electronic records, and obstructed the legitimate performance of official duties of the public official in charge of the Gyeonggi-si Construction and the Construction Team by deceptive means.

2. Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D’s joint criminal acts were executed by Defendant A, and Defendant B’s design was 2,600 meters wide from the design map of QDa households in Gwangju-si, which was designed and supervised by using the name of the architect J, even though the design was 2,600 meters wide from the book, and was actually 1,950 meters wide.