beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.11.07 2017나63880

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except where the following phrases are added to the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

[However, the co-defendant D (hereinafter “D”) of the first instance court, which is separately established

2. The addition to the addition

A. Following the phrase “entry” in the fourth fourth fourth sentence of the judgment of the first instance, the phrase “each testimony of a witness G and D” is added.

B. Of the judgment of the first instance, the following phrases shall be added at the end of the second sentence below.

[Additionally, considering that the Plaintiff’s representative at the time of the Plaintiff’s submission of the evidence alone, it is insufficient to prove that the Defendants conspired with Defendant C, the representative director of F, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this differently. Accordingly, even if the Defendants partly participated in the process of decision-making process of the instant construction project, it is difficult to acknowledge the proximate causal relation between the Defendants’ act and the Defendants’ act as a result of failure to complete the instant construction project due to the failure to perform the instant construction project, and the instant construction project appears to cause the aggravation of financial resources. Thus, the evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to prove that Defendant B, who was the Plaintiff’s representative at the time of the Plaintiff’s failure to perform the construction project, would have caused the aggravation of financial resources, thereby allowing Defendant C, the representative director of F, to receive the instant construction project.

3. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is justified.