The plaintiff's assertion, such as the statement on the ground of application (the plaintiff, the debtor, and the defendant) does not conflict between the parties, or it can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the whole arguments in the statement Nos. 1 through 8.

Therefore, the defendant shall pay the money stated in Paragraph (1) of the Disposition to the plaintiff jointly and severally with B (Separation of payment order).

The defendant asserts that the plaintiff's claim is without merit since five years have elapsed since the date of acquisition of the claim by the plaintiff from September 30, 1998, which was the date of acquisition of the claim by the plaintiff, and five years have passed since the commercial extinctive prescription period by the plaintiff. However, the defendant's objection to the extinctive prescription is not accepted because it is merely for the extension of the extinctive prescription period of the plaintiff's claim through the Daejeon District Court's 97da12422, support 207da32425.

There is no legal assertion that would otherwise preclude the plaintiff's claim.

(A) The defendant has already not been present on the date of pleading, without submitting any additional reply containing his argument that there is no benefit from the judgment due to default. The conclusion is the plaintiff's favor.