The appeal is dismissed.

(F) The sentence of the original court (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is reasonable to consider that the Defendant led to the entire crime of this case, and reflects his mistake, and that the Defendant agreed with the victims of the injury.

However, the crime of fraud of this case is that the defendant intentionally caused a traffic accident over several occasions and acquired insurance proceeds from the insurance company. Such insurance fraud causes damage to the decent majority of policyholders, which is not agreed with the victim of the fraud, the fact that there is a heavy liability for the crime of this case, the fact that there is a record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime, all the sentencing conditions including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, and the range of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines set by the Sentencing Commission of the Supreme Court, and the crime of this case: fraud group, general fraud, type 1 (less than KRW 100,00), type 1 (less than KRW 100,00), type 2 and 3, the scope of recommendation (basic area), the scope of recommendation (including June 1 to June 16), the scope of recommendation (general injury) and special mitigation (in the area where punishment was not imposed or a considerable amount of damage), the scope of recommendation (excluding punishment) and punishment).

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.