2. The conclusion that the Defendant recognized the instant crime is favorable, or that the Defendant had four previous convictions, including the suspended sentence of imprisonment, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime, even though the judgment of the suspended sentence became final and conclusive on December 13, 2019 due to drinking driving, it is unfavorable for the Defendant to commit the instant crime.

There is no special relationship or change of circumstances that can be newly considered by this court, and in full view of the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.