임차보증금반환
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 25,00,000 as well as 20% per annum from May 4, 2013 to the day of complete payment.
Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments made by Gap 2-1, 2-2, and 3-8 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the defendant on February 25, 201, through the head of the original branch of the plaintiff, through the head of the original branch of the plaintiff, with the second floor (hereinafter referred to as "the office of this case") among the fourth floor of the D ground reinforced concrete structure, sloping roof, and light-scale steel-frame prefabricated roof owned by the defendant, the lease deposit amount of KRW 25 million, the lease deposit period of KRW 25 million from February 25, 2011 to February 25, 2013, and the lease agreement was concluded between the defendant and the head of the original branch of the plaintiff, and transferred the lease deposit amount of KRW 25 million from January 28, 201 to February 25, 2011.
According to the above facts, the lease contract for the office of this case was terminated upon the expiration of the term, and the defendant is the person to whom the office of this case was returned on February 28, 2013. Thus, barring any special circumstance, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff a lease deposit of 25 million won with respect to the office of this case and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from May 4, 2013 to the date of complete payment, as requested by the plaintiff, as requested by the plaintiff.
On January 27, 2011, the Defendant concluded a lease agreement on the instant office with the Plaintiff’s president C, the president of the original domicile, and concluded a modified lease agreement with C on July 20, 201, which changed the above lease agreement into KRW 20 million and KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000 won.
Therefore, as long as it is recognized that the lessee of the lease contract for the office of this case is the plaintiff or C, the court shall have no counter-proof evidence as long as the authenticity of the disposal document is established.