Seized evidence shall be confiscated as provided for in Articles 9 through 12.

1. 도박개장 피고인은 2015. 4. 5. 01:00경부터 06:45경까지 전남 해남군 C에 있는 D 펜션 3층 객실 내에 도박장을 마련하고 도박에 참여할 사람들을 불러 모은 후 30여 명의 도박 참여자들에게 화투 20매를 이용하여 5장씩 4군데로 나눈 다음 선의 화투를 제외한 3곳 중 마음에 드는 곳에 각자 최소 5만 원에서 최대 50만 원씩을 걸고 5장의 패 중 3장으로 10의 배수를 맞춘 후 나머지 2장의 합의 끝수로 승패를 정하는 일명 ‘도리짓고땡’이라는 도박을 하게 한 다음 매회 주최자 몫으로 판돈의 10%의 수수료를 떼어 약 900만원 상당의 수수료를 받았다.

Accordingly, the defendant opened a gambling place for profit-making purposes.

2. 도박 피고인은 전항 기재 일시 및 장소에서 E, F, G 등 30여 명과 100여회에 걸쳐 위와 같이 일명 ‘도리짓고땡’이라는 도박을 함께 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant Article 247 of the Criminal Act and Articles 247 (Gambling Place and Selection of Imprisonment) and Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act (Gambling Point and Selection of Imprisonment) of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act does not have any record of being punished for the same kind of crime against the defendant, but appears to have drawn up the people who play a role necessary for gambling, such as the person who hosts gambling and lends gambling money, etc. for the purpose of punishing money, and that there is a need to scambling in the society and people who do not have a large number of crimes related to gambling, etc., the sentence shall be imposed on the defendant: Provided, That the term of punishment shall be determined as per the order, taking into account the family circumstances of the defendant