The sentencing of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

On November 17, 2012, the first head of the judgment of the court below that sentenced the defendant to a punishment is final and conclusive, such as the crime of special robbery, etc. which became final and conclusive on November 17, 2012, which is favorable to the defendant. However, the crime of this case is committed habitually from the victims, and the nature of the crime is not weak. Nevertheless, the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim C, D, there was no record of protective disposition or criminal punishment until several times of the crime of this case, and in particular, the defendant was released with the prior measure of suspension of execution due to the above special robbery, and thus, the defendant committed the crime of this case more than three years without prison labor, and there is no reason to reduce the punishment of this case, and there is no reason to reduce the punishment of this case under the law, such as imprisonment with prison labor for more than three years, and there is no reason to reduce the punishment of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no ground for appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition.