전자금융거래법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (3 million won in penalty) is unreasonable because it is too unfilled.
2. Although it is necessary to strictize the act of lending an access medium used for the crime of licensing, the lower court’s punishment is too unfeasible and unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant reflects the Defendant; (b) the first offender was not benefiting from the crime; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, and circumstances after the crime; and (b) the overall sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive
3. Accordingly, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.