To the extent that the facts charged and the basic facts are identical and are not likely to substantially disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, specific facts are partially recognized differently from those charged.

The Defendant is a person who served as the head of the management support office of C Co., Ltd. (the representative director D; hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”) with the purpose of software development wholesale business from July 2006 to October 2016, and has overall control over the financial affairs of the above company and managed and executed funds.

피고인은 2012. 1. 25. 경 서울 서초구 E 건물 B 동 14 층에 있는 피해자 회사 사무실에서, 거래처로부터 수금하여 피해자 회사의 은행계좌에 업무상 보관 중이 던 위 회사의 자금 중 1,500만 원을 자기 앞수표로 발행한 후, 그 무렵 서울 시내 일원에서 상품권을 샀다가 되파는 방법으로 위 수표를 현금화한 다음 이를 지인인 F 명의로 개설한 증권계좌에 입금하여 피고인의 선물 옵션 투자금으로 사용한 것을 비롯하여, 그때부터 2016. 10. 10. 경까지 별지 범죄 일람표( 순 번 6, 29, 45, 66, 71, 122, 123, 126, 128, 129, 133, 134, 145, 152, 155, 157, 161, 165~167, 170, 174, 179, 181, 186 제외) 기 재와 같이 총 191회에 걸쳐 피해자 회사의 자금 합계 4,708,527,338원을 위 증권계좌에 입금하여 피고인의 선물 옵션 투자금으로 사용하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant embezzled 4,708,527,338 won of the funds of the victim company, which was under custody in the course of business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F or D;

1. Each investigation report [Attachment of F alternative securities trading details, hearing of the D phone statement by the representative of the CBA, hearing of the statements by G attorney-at-law by the bankruptcy administrator of the CBA, hearing of F phone statement by the administrator of the CBA, submitting a complaint by G attorney-at-law, attaching the details of transaction in the name of the CBA bank account in the name of the CBA,