2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: although the defendant's mistake was recognized, it seems that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in depth, and the victim D of the bodily injury of this case, damage to property, and obstruction of business was considered to have committed each of the crimes of this case under the influence of alcohol, and the victim D already expressed his intention to punish the defendant against the defendant, and the amount of damage suffered by the above victim due to the crime of causing property damage of this case is relatively less than the amount of damage suffered by the defendant. However, the defendant has already been punished several times due to the crime of the same kind of the bodily injury of this case, damage to property, and obstruction of business, and the suspension of execution of imprisonment with prison labor and imprisonment with prison labor for not more than six months since the completion of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime as the crime of obstruction of business of this case, without being familiarly considered during the repeated period of a repeated crime, and the victim F of the insult of this case did not receive a letter from the above victim, and the defendant's age before and after and after the defendant's age, circumstances, career circumstances, and circumstances.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.