However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 03:10 on January 25, 2015, the Defendant, at the soup room of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C” in Yongsan-gu, had been calculated as a customer in advance, and had been aware of the director-general, who was an employee of the victim D(the age of 47) who was working in the front of the Kabter, and tried to take the victim's face free of charge on the soup bank, and then tried to take the victim's face on the ground that the victim refused it, on the ground that he did not so, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the victim's seat twice, and the victim's face at one time as a drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (which is not limited to the degree of injury of the victim) is that the crime of this case was committed on the ground that the victim refused to take soup free of charge of soup. It is not good that the crime was committed.

The defendant shall choose to imprisonment with prison labor in consideration of the fact that he/she has repeatedly committed the same crime even though he/she has been punished at least ten times in the same kind: Provided, That the degree of injury of the victim is not severe, and the victim does not want the punishment by agreement, the punishment shall be determined like the order.