2. Determination

A. According to the records, the court below sentenced the punishment by taking into account the following factors: (a) the error is divided and reflected; (b) the same does not exist; (c) the size of gambling; (d) health conditions; and (e) family environment; and (e) the punishment was imposed.

B. Although there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the original judgment as the new sentencing materials have not been submitted in the trial court, and considering the various reasons revealed in the oral proceedings, the lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate and it does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

C. Therefore, the argument of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.