However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the defendants is against the defendants for one year.

The Defendants committed a theft of a decoration in the vicinity of the orchard in the Seopopo-si, Seopo-gu, Seopo-gu, with a view to using it as a fire fighter of the farm operated by Defendant A.

1. From March 12, 2015 to March 14, 2015, Defendants jointly committed the crime between A.M. and around March 14, 2015, and they stolen, from March 12, 2015 to March 14, 2015, the victim’s market value at approximately five tons of the unclaimed 5 tons of the unclaimed market value, which was kept in the airspace near the field of dry field located in E 200 meters in Seopo-si from March 12, 2015.

2. From March 16, 2015 to March 17, 2015, Defendants jointly committed a crime between A.M. and B. and B. From March 16, 2015, from March 16, 2015 to March 17, 2015, the market price, the victim F., who was kept in a dry field near the field located at a point of 200 meters adjacent to E as set forth in paragraph (1), was stolen by carrying approximately two tons of the unclaimed small amount of 2 tons on the market price of the victim F.M. on the ground of the cargo vehicle as set forth in paragraph (1).

3. On April 2, 2015, around 08:30, the Defendants jointly and severally committed the crime, and around April 2, 2015, around 08:30 on April 2, 2015, the victim I, who was kept in the orchard of the victim I in Seopopo City H, was stolen by carrying approximately KRW 1 ton of 330,000,000,000 in the market value of 200,000 won, which was the victim’s possession, in the orchard of the victim I’s possession.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement of I and F;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Discretionary mitigation Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 (Article 55(1) of the Criminal Act is the first offender, the victim F and the victim I have agreed with the Defendant)

1. Defendants in a suspended sentence: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Consideration for Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);