beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.10 2018고단4038

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

[Defendant A] Nos. 1 through 4 (Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office.) of the evidence attached to Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for one year

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants A and B violated the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc. of Arranging Commercial Sex Acts (such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) are unemployment owners at the 3-5th floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government P building; Defendant B, from June 15, 2017, was the president of the above business establishment in the name of customers, employees management, settlement, etc.; Defendants A, in collusion, conspired with Defendants A from November 15, 2016 to June 4, 2018 to have them receive 3,4, and 5 p building units from November 15, 2017 to June 4, 2018 to have them receive 3,4, and 8, employees' waiting rooms, employees' rest rooms, 200 male customers, and 1,000 employees of the above business establishment and 1,000 male customers and 2,000 employees of the above business establishment, including male customers and 1,000 customers.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. Defendants C, D, E, F, and G’s violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc. of Arranging Commercial Sex Acts (referring to brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts), even though they were aware that they engaged in commercial sex acts for the said business, Defendant D, from March 21, 2018 to April 2, 2018, was employed as a day-time camera management employee; Defendant E, from March 23, 2018 to April 7, 2018, was in charge of the affairs such as the collection of commercial sex prices and the settlement of books; Defendant C, from October 9, 2017 to June 4, 2018; Defendant F, from November 21, 2017 to April 15, 2018 to his/her employees, Defendant C provided their respective duties, including night employees; Defendant C, from March 23, 2018 to April 15, 2017 to 2017 to 10.

Accordingly, the Defendants are businesses A and B.