beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.05.16 2017나24588

공탁금출급청구권 확인 등의 소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The court of the first instance alleged the right to the instant case on the ground that the Plaintiff’s right to claim for registration acquired by the Plaintiff was expired due to possession of the Defendant B, who is the registered titleholder, before the claim for registration becomes impossible to be fulfilled.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same, except for the entry of evidence Nos. 15 and 16 and the rejection of K’s testimony by the witness at the trial, which are insufficient to view that the right to claim registration based on the expiration of the acquisition period was exercised, and thus, it is also acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.