When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

【2016 High 900, the Defendant, on November 01, 2015, 21:21:20, hereinafter referred to as “D’ operated by the victim C(65 years of age, women) located in Suwon-si (hereinafter referred to as “D”) to pay food costs, despite the lack of intent or ability to pay food costs, the Defendant, who received financial benefits by placing an order for alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 39,000,00, such as C. C., C., C., C., C., C., and C., at the birth rate of 1.39,000, and did not pay the cost after eating.

【2016 High 901, Oct. 15, 2015, the Defendant found in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and “F cafeteria” around 00:15, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s restaurant business by force for about 20 minutes from the same day to 30:355 of the same day, on October 2015, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

【2016 High Court Decision 900

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Receipts:

1. Records of photographs taken on the spot 2016 ancient 901

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the field and photographs of business reports;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;