On October 7, 2016, from around 01:48 to 01:55 on the same day, the Defendant opened a door that was parked in the underground parking lot of Suwon-gu J building, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and went into a door that was owned by the victim K, and cut off the door at a tweet of 500,000 won of the market value, which is owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 329 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Imprisonment) with respect to the facts constituting an offense to which the provisions of the Acts and subordinate statutes stated in the statement prepared by K are applicable;

1. The scope of recommended punishment for the sentencing criteria / [type] the scope of punishment for general property / [the scope of punishment for a person subject to special mitigation] mitigated area (the scope of punishment for a person subject to special mitigation]: April to October; and

2. In light of the fact that the defendant who was sentenced to a sentence has a record of having received juvenile protective disposition several times for the same crime, and that the defendant did not agree with the victim and did not recover from the damage, it is reasonable to sentence the defendant to a sentence.

As to the term of punishment, there are no circumstances to consider the circumstances leading to the crime because the defendant was under poor circumstances, and the circumstances leading to the crime do not exist. The defendant did not have any past record of criminal punishment prior to the instant case, and considering the favorable circumstances that the defendant led to the confession of the crime. Considering the aforementioned circumstances and other circumstances shown in the arguments in the instant case, such as the defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime, it shall be determined within the scope of recommended punishment as stated in the text.