When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 06:50 on June 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven a B car with B carren, and driven a road in front of the 895 B car in front of the Cheongju-gu, Seocheon-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do along one-lanes from the Cmiddle School to the 1-lane ecological park; (b) followed by the victim D(44 years old) driving along the two-lanes, which followed the latter, while driving along the two-lanes, followed the two-lanes from the latter; and (c) caused the Defendant’s car to play the same behavior with the victim, on the ground that he changed his own course in the front of the Defendant’s car.

Accordingly, the defendant, while driving a one-lane vehicle from the two-lane to the left-hand direction, was changed from the two-lane to the one-lane, and was rapidly operated after the time limit for the victim's driver's vehicle in the future. Then, the defendant's vehicle avoiding the defendant's vehicle to the two-lane, driving over the one-lane and the two-lanes in front of the victim's vehicle changing the course to the two-lane, and interfered with the course of the victim, while driving over the two-lanes, the defendant threatened the victim with any harm to the body or property of the victim by rapidly driving the vehicle at the distance of the literacy ecological park.

In this respect, the defendant carried a dangerous object, and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Video data and closures;

1. Details of receipt of the national newspaper;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel of the next enemy bureau argued that he had changed or obstructed the course rapidly as indicated in its reasoning, but it was a normal speed operation. Thus, considering the evidence duly adopted and examined, the Defendant was able to sufficiently recognize the fact that the Defendant was rapidly boomed by undergoing a sudden drive without any particular reason immediately after changing the course from the second lane to the first lane, and the fact that the Defendant was rapidly boomed by undergoing a sudden drive without any specific reason. Thus, the above evidence can be sufficiently recognized.