If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On November 21, 2016, at around 00:30 on November 21, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of the C convenience store in Pyeongtaek-si B, and the circumstances leading up to the police officer belonging to the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station D District Police Station called up upon receipt of the 112 report, causing the Defendant’s skeing, and thereby, the Defendant’s walked, “Chewing, sarked, and fladed, flad,”

We see withp, see it, “I see it,” and see it as “I am, see it, walked three times the am of the above E, and then assaulted the face of the above E one time by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing conditions of the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime are determined by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order and other conditions of the sentencing indicated in the record.

- The nature of the crime of this case does not correspond to that of the crime, provided that the degree of damage caused by the crime of this case does not focus on the degree of damage. - The defendant has no record of criminal punishment for the same crime. - The defendant is against his mistake.