However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

To the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's right of defense, some expressions in the facts charged were legally adopted and the court corrected ex officio based on the evidence investigated by this court.

1. On January 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around September 20, 2014, to D, an employee of the victim C Co., Ltd., who was an employee of the Changjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E Apartment-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Co., Ltd., a model lower court, which had been known to the public from the model lower court in Jin-dong Special Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

A false statement was made to the F Co., Ltd. that “the windows and glass construction works are different from that to be subcontracted for apartments and glass construction works.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to allow the victim company to subcontract favorable construction works for the above apartment from the FF corporation.

The Defendant, from February 17, 2014 to February 21, 2014, caused the victim company to perform construction work with a cost of KRW 701,526,00,000 for construction cost at the above E Apartment Model House from around February 17, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and caused the above Model House Construction Business Co., Ltd. to acquire financial benefits by engineering.

2. On May 2014, the Defendant concluded that the foregoing D was false at an influent place located in the front city of North Korea, stating that “The Defendant changed KRW 5 million to allow the said D to build favorable and windows at the E-Newly constructed construction site.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to allow the victim company to subcontract favorable construction works for the above apartment from the FF corporation.

On May 28, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 5 million from the victim company to the bank account of G’s husband’s husband’s wife G as the expenses for the introduction of the Corporation.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness H and I.