beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.10.11 2012고단3428

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The Defendant in the instant charges is a person engaging in driving a C-si.

On April 22, 2012, the Defendant driven the above taxi on April 22, 2012, and proceeded along two lanes from the edge of the horse to the color-distance distance. The Defendant driven the 4-lane road in front of the color police box, which is in the color-driven of the area of the Suwon-si.

At that time, the speed limit was about 80 km at a speed of 80 km, and thus, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to make the person engaged in driving the motor vehicle a speed of less than 20/100 at a speed of less than 64 km per hour, which reduces the speed of 20/100.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found the victim D's ES3 car that passed the intersection from the side of the construction section distribution complex to the high side of the road to the high side of the road, but did not avoid it, and did not flick the front side of the said taxi at the front side.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence on the part of the victim D, the injury, such as the alley of the dulled floor that requires approximately 13 weeks of medical treatment, and the injury to the victim F who was on the si in the si in need of approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment.

2. Determination

A. The driver of a vehicle driving a private-distance intersection where traffic is controlled by a signal, etc. according to green light shall, unless there are special circumstances, be sufficient when other vehicles are believed to observe traffic regulations and take appropriate measures to avoid collision. There is no duty of care to take special measures to prevent the occurrence of accidents in the event that other vehicles are in front of a vehicle in violation of the signal and are in front of the vehicle that is directly driving, and there is no duty of care to take special measures to prevent the occurrence of accidents. In addition, if the driver would have continued to observe the speed limit, the driver would avoid the collision after finding that the victim directly enters the road.