beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.09.29 2016가합101571

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff in the position of the party is a person who has engaged in export business in the third country with respect to self-denunciation materials (direct distribution and congested presses), etc. under the trade name of "C", and the defendant is a company that engages in combined freight forwarding business, etc.

The Plaintiff entered into a maritime transport contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff issued a bill of lading from August 201 to October 201, 201, including two of the following two contracts: (a) the Defendant entered into a contract with the Defendant to transport the self-denunciation materials, etc. produced by the Plaintiff in China from August 201 to the end of the year.

On August 201, the Defendant, at the request of the Plaintiff, intended to transport secondary materials from CHIWN to 3,00 U.S. dollars c,00 U.S. dollars c,00. On August 31, 201, the Defendant issued a bill of lading with the consignor C and consignee as D.

On October 201, the Plaintiff: (a) requested the Defendant to transport secondary materials 2,109 mar (hereinafter “the instant cargo”) from the Chinese Citymen (XIMN) to the Guate City through the tezar Mala-Gu Mala-gu Mala-gu Mala-Ma; and (b) the Defendant issued 4 copies of the instant cargo to verify the cargo as follows and Mana-si Mana-si Mana-si Mana-si Mana-si Mana-si Mana-si Mana-dong B/ 10 on September 30, 201, 10: (c) the shipper (the consignee) who was not indicated on September 30, 201 as the consignee on September 30, 201, and issued 3) copies of the instant cargo to the Plaintiff on September 1, 2011, on the same Mana-dong 31, Dong 104, Dong Ma131, Dong Ga-dong Ma-dong 131, Dong Ma.

The Plaintiff’s bill of lading to the consignee of the instant cargo.